Evaluation of last week's trading calls

Thought about doing this for a while now, so let me just get on to it now:

In my last weekend's "Weekly Trading Calls", I analyzed 14 stocks and made a total of 25 trading calls:

** Winning calls: 8, or 32%, for a total of 70 points (8,6,5,4,7,8,33)
** True Losing calls: 1, or 4%, for a loss of about 1 point;
** Un-materialized calls: 13, or 52%.
** Near-miss calls: 4, or 16%

The near-miss calls are those that were either barely not being hit or barely stopped out. Several of them were heart-breaking ones that would've produced spectacular profits:
1. BIDU:
The call -- "DT-L2 if it spikes towards MA200 (around 241), IDS just below 240, CS below MA200, IT=254, r/r=3:12"
The near miss -- It spiked to as low as 237 on Jan. 23, which would've stopped out the position and miss the subsequent profit of as much as 90 points.
2. ICE:
The call-- "Speculative L3, entry zone=118-126, stop just below 117, IT=MA200, r/r=9:28"
The near miss-- On Jan. 22, it spiked to as low as 126.87, therefore did not hit the order that could produce as high as 38 points.
3. SONS:
The call -- SW-L2 when a capitulation occurs in coming days, scaled entry zone 3.21-3.52, stop just below 3.2, IT=4.5, r/r=0.32:0.98
The near miss-- On Jan. 22, it spiked down to as low as 3, therefore would stop out the position that could've produce over 30% of gain in the follow sessions.

The best winning calls are on RIMM, CRM, and AAPL.

And here is the sad part: I only acted on one winning call (SOLF). While some can be attributed to the near-miss calls (I literally stared at the BIDU and SONS when they were in those ranges), the failure of acting on the winning calls are a bit disturbing. Just read a post by Dr. Brett Steenbarger titled "The Most Important Reason Individual Investors Lose Money", and one of such important reason is "failure to trade reliable, tested ideas", I need to be cured, really!